Why H-P Buyback Is Bad News For The Economy

Wall street Journal : the company said it will spend $10 billion buying its shares, which are languishing near the 52-week low. The timing defies the tendency of U.S. corporations to buy their own stock during the high points of the market and avoid buy backs during the troughs.


The latest buyback also is clearly a nod to investors who have endured months of turmoil, from CEO Mark Hurd’s surprise resignation to a bidding war for 3PAR, a relatively obscure network storage company. Concerns about a leadership void and concerns about overpaying for 3PAR have driven H-P shares down to yearly lows.

It is important to put the latest authorization into perspective. The $10 billion comes on top of $8 billion in buybacks authorized in November 2009. The total far exceeds the amount of money that the company has spent each year on M&A for the past nine years, excluding 2008, when the H-P spent $13 billion on Electronic Data Systems, according to data provider Dealogic. Also consider that the buybacks total 17% of H-P’s market capitalization. Investors, of course, love the buybacks. H-P shares are up 1.75%, while the broader market is down by nearly that amount.

But looking beyond the corporate parameters of H-P, the buyback arguably sends a dispiriting message about the state of technology industry and the overall economy. Consider that the buybacks come as H-P is spending increasingly less on Research and Development. In 2009, the company’s R&D budget was $2.8 billion, not much more than the the $2.3 billion it spent in 1998. As a percentage of revenue, the drop in R&D has been dramatic. R&D was 2.5% of revenue last year, compared with 6% of revenue in 1998.

To be sure, H-P’s revenues have expanded greatly over the past decade since it acquired Compaq and Electronic Data Services. Nonetheless, the fact that its R&D has not kept pace perhaps signals that a company, once known for its innovating prowess, is taking the easier route in keeping its shareholders happy.
As the recent bidding war for 3PAR illustrates, it is easier (and logical) to spend billions buying technology that others have created than spending that money on R&D that may or may not produce a viable product.
But that is not ideal for the broader economy, which benefits from the creation of new products to help it grow and create jobs.

Amid great economic uncertainty, H-P likely figures it can get more bang for its buck by focusing on the financial engineering of share buybacks than on the engineering of new technologies that made the company famous.

Never Discount the Grumbling Workers

(Article : TheStreet.com. Image : http://fuckyoumarkhurd.com/)

Setting aside these more salacious details, I thought the most interesting new information came from Joe Nocera of The New York Times Friday. In his column, Nocera suggests the real reason Hurd was shunted aside was that he'd lost the trust and respect of the HP employees, and that charges of sexual harassment and inflated expenses merely masked that fact. Nocera illustrates this with some damning faint praise for Hurd from analysts and HP employees, both former and current:
"He was a cost-cutter who indulged himself."
"Mr. Hurd cares about one thing, how much money is in it for him. As an HP employee I see it every day. We don't have the tools to do our job, but he isn't doing without anything and doesn't care."
"He didn't have the support of his people. . . . he seemed to be the only one benefiting from HP's success"
"I was delighted to see Hurd go."
" . . . he lacks the moral character to be CEO."

I believe these latest revelations show board did lose trust in Hurd, thus providing reason to suggest he move on. However, I also believe Nocera has put his finger on a critical point: namely, the depth of HP employees' resentment toward Hurd for well over a year. About a year ago, for instance, I wrote about my belief that Hurd was not such a great CEO as what was portrayed by Wall Street analysts and investors -- and I remember being very surprised at the immediate and strong reaction I got from then-current HP employees. They were all united in their antipathy for Hurd.

They complained about how he'd cut the business to the bone but didn't have any ability to grow the company's revenues. They talked about his hypocrisy in forcing 5% across-the-board paycuts while doubling, tripling, or quadrupling senior executives' total compensation in the same year. Most of all, they complained of Hurd's total inability to connect with HP employees and a disregard for the vaunted "HP Way" of the past.

The comments and emails went on and on. Many pleaded with me not to share them publicly for fear of losing their jobs. Some of the comments I received for my most recent HP article, which published last Wednesday following Hurd's departure, further highlight the employees' sentiment:
"As a long-time HP employee, I have seen this incredible greed by our executives for some time while the employees have suffered income loss: loss of benefits and, more importantly, loss of jobs. There is no remnant of Bill and Dave's company left."
"Hurd did the same thing to HP that he did to NCR, a tech firm Hurd headed prior to his term at HP. He squeezes out profits in the short term at the expense of the long-term viability of the company. HP's IT information technology has been gutted, there is little to no growth in existing businesses, morale is terrible, teamwork is dead thanks to forced rankings, there is no innovation, and pretty much everything is outsourced.
"I agree there is nothing left of Bill and Dave's company. Working for them was such an inspiration. They were the epitome of humility and conservative frugality. They treated us so well and we were frugal too to repay them. Our management-development department worked hard to capture their style in our programs, to teach managers the "HP Way.'"

I remember chatting with some investors last year about these kinds of emails and comments. They immediately discounted them and defended Hurd. They said things such as:
"What do you expect from a bunch of workers? These are the whiners that Hurd probably already cut out of the business."
"Employees always complain. What matters is that Hurd's making the numbers. He delivers what he says he will."
"'The HP Way" -- who cares? That's not how business is run today. Fiorina should have whipped this company into shape, and Hurd finally went in there and did it."

I believe there's some truth both in the side of the employees and that of the analysts. But what's striking to me is just how easy it was -- before Hurd was forced out -- for outsiders to belittle the importance of employee satisfaction. Obviously people who comment on a story or email an author to complain are going to be the ones most upset about Hurd, and maybe there was a silent majority who thought he was doing just fine. For me, however, the quantity of strongly upset employees last year was a clear warning sign of trouble ahead for the company and for Hurd. You can't just stuff those kinds of feelings down for long without some problems cropping up down the road.

It's also interesting to reflect on the investors' comments now and see how quick they were to attribute HP's success to Hurd alone, and to discount the crucial nature of culture and of workers' feelings. I'm not saying all investors and analysts need to start holding hands and singing "Kumbaya" when they look at their price-to-earnings ratios. If nothing else, though, the HP affair shows that -- in this age multiple rounds of layoffs and real economic hardship that affects millions of workers -- investors need to examine the happiness of the remaining workers with the CEOs and senior executives who are leading them.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Never-Discount-the-Grumbling-tsmp-982139253.html?x=0&.v=1&.pf=family-home&mod=pf-family-home

HP Shouldn't Pay for Hurd's Mistakes

" NEW YORK (TheStreet) --HP's ousted and disgraced Chairman and CEO Mark Hurd screwed up and investors have to pay for it. I don't get it.

Despite concluding that Hurd's conduct "displayed a profound lack of judgment", HP gave him a big-money sendoff to the tune of $12.2 million in severance payments, an extension of the deadline to cash in options on 775,000 HP shares, pro-rata vesting and settlement of 330,177 performance-based restricted stock units, settlement on December 11, 2010 of 15,853 time-based restricted stock and eligibility for continued group medical and dental coverage for up to 18 months., according to an SEC filing retrieved through EdgarOnline.

Why should a single dime come out of the bottom line? Why should a single share be awarded to someone who, in his own words, "did not live up to the standards and principles of trust, respect and integrity" that he demanded of others at HP?
Make no mistake, Hurd wasn't hurting for the money. As Eric Jackson pointed out in his recent column titled Mark Hurd's Excesses Were in Plain Sight, Hurd's total compensation for 2008 was $43 million, making him the fourth-highest-paid CEO that year.
HP's board may think it is fair to reward Hurd for the work he did to set the company back on the road to success -- and there are few who don't acknowledge that the company improved under his leadership -- but what about the damage to HP's reputation that Hurd also inflicted in the end?

The performance of a leader must be measured -- and rewarded -- based on more than the numbers. Integrity matters. Trust matters. We're talking about "violations of HP's Standards of Business Conduct" by the man who held ultimate responsibility for corporate conduct.
Hurd should have been fired, but the board on which he had served as chairman didn't have the stomach for it.
It may appear that the board took the high road by pushing Hurd out, but the severance agreement shows that old-school, nepotistic boardroom behavior is alive and well in America.
The message to investors is clear: The instinct among board members to look out for their own is stronger than their sense of duty to shareholders "

Jodie [Fisher] Will Likely Get 300,000 Thank You Notes’

By Michael Corkery, Wall Street Journal

If ever there was a case of schadenfreude, it is on display by the employees, past and present, of Hewlett-Packard.
As one of worker put it, “we had an office party this Monday at HP HQ,’’ to celebrate the resignation of CEO Mark Hurd amid an expense account scandal. In short, dozens of readers identifying themselves as H-P employees or ex-employees have left comments on Deal Journal cheering Hurd’s resignation.

Hurd may have been beloved by Wall Street (H-P’s stock tumbled 8% on Monday, but rose more than fourfold during his five-year tenure at the H-P helm) but he wasn’t loved by everybody inside the technology giant where he had implemented draconian cost cuts, including laying off thousands of people.
“Many HP employees were dancing in the hallways today, the witch is dead. Morale was at an all-time low at lunch last Friday,’’ wrote one employee. “Jodie will likely get about 300,000 thank you notes.”
While expressing delight in his resignation, many objected to the “golden parachute” that will cushion the fall from grace. Hurd, who ranks among the top paid CEO’s in the nation, will walk away with about $28 million in severance and stock options.“If any employee was found fiddling with their expenses they would be marched out of the building and tossed into the street. No compensation. Why then should Hurd get any compensation?” asked one Deal Journal commenter.
There were some who called out Hurd’s apparent hypocrisy: A CEO who was ruthless in his efforts to cut expenses was accused of falsifying his own expense reports.
A reader identifying himself as Joe the engineer from HP wrote: Hurd’s employees left in droves (including me). The rest would have left when the economy got better… those that he didn’t fire, anyway. I love watching all this happen to him, couldn’t have happened to a better guy. Thanks Mark for making me take all that ethics training - looks like YOU were the one who needed it.
Judging from the comments, much of the animosity appeared to come from EDS, the software company that H-P acquired in 2008.
An ex-EDS employee writes: “God he deserved it. The way we (EDS ) employees were treated after the merger, was just terrible. HP made their numbers basically through the EDS division and we got rewarded with a 20% pay cut. Mark also took a pay cut on his base salary - note base salary not on his bonuses! I am glad that he will be using his bonus money to pay his lawyers.”
Of course, it is unclear whether such comments are a representative sampling of the H-P morale or the venting of a few disgruntled workers. But it is clear that Hurd didn’t inspire much love from some corners of the company.

H.P. Ousts Chief for Hiding Payments to "Friend"

Yes !!!

"conflict of interest, failed to maintain accurate expense reports, and misused company assets".

"The woman’s lawyer contacted the company in late June, charging sexual harassment. While the directors were investigating that charge, they found inaccurate expense reports that covered payments made to the woman. The directors said, however, that the sexual harassment charge was unsubstantiated.

The board charged that Mr. Hurd, 53, failed to disclose his use of company funds. It urged Mr. Hurd to resign, but he balked and offered to compensate the company for the disputed funds, said to range from $1,000 to $20,000, according to a person close to Mr. Hurd who was briefed on the situation but was not authorized to speak publicly.
The board, however, insisted. “This was a necessary decision,” said Marc L. Andreessen, a venture capitalist and a director.
...
Mr. Holston also said Mr. Hurd used inaccurate expense reports to conceal the relationship with the woman. Mr. Hurd, who is married, has denied having a sexual relationship with the woman, according to the person briefed on the situation. Mr. Hurd declined comment.
Gloria Allred, the celebrity lawyer who has agreed to represent the woman, said, “We want to make clear that there was no affair and no intimate sexual relationship between our client and Mr. Hurd.” She declined to make the woman available for an interview or to identify her.
The company’s stock plummeted almost 10 percent on Friday on the news of Mr. Hurd, known for his straight-talking, analytical approach to business. Mr. Hurd rewired H.P. through layoffs, acquisitions and relentless cost-cutting measures.

The woman worked for H.P. between the fall of 2007 and the fall of 2009, having been hired by the office of the chief executive, the company said. Sources close to the company and familiar with the situation said that over a number of months, the contractor attended events for H.P. in Asia, Europe and the United States, and often dined alone with Mr. Hurd after the events. The contractor’s fees ranged from $1,000 to $5,000 for events in the United States and up to $10,000 for overseas ventures.

Even though the same contractor was present, Mr. Hurd said that he dined alone or with a different person on his expense reports, these people said.
A person briefed on this situation said Mr. Hurd had described the situation as “surreal and bizarre.” Mr. Hurd has denied any romantic context in the relationship with the contractor and talked about the board being swayed by the potential public relations problems that would follow accusations of sexual harassment.

Mr. Hurd, who was in the midst of contract negotiations with the board, did not file his own expenses, this person said. H.P.’s board and Mr. Hurd had, over the past month, been negotiating a new contract that would have had him earning $100 million over the next three years, according to a person briefed on the meetings. "

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/07/business/07hewlett.html?_r=1

Anger in UK.

Network World

An announcement that HP will cut more than 900 jobs in the UK by October has prompted anger from the Unite union

HP has announced internally that 934 jobs will be axed in the UK by October.
According to Unite union, HP has a 16,500-strong workforce in the UK, which could also be affected by a further 1,000 job cuts from November, which the union said is a "proportional" part of the 9,000 job cuts worldwide that the company announced last month.

The union is planning to meet with HP in the next two weeks for negotiations.
In a statement, HP said: "[The proposed changes] were first discussed with the HP European Works Council in November 2009 and have been part of an ongoing consultation process since then." HP also said that the "proposed changes" were "part of the company's ongoing review of its business".

However, Unite said that the latest round of job cuts was particularly painful after seeing nearly 4,000 jobs being cut over the past two years since HP took over EDS. "This will create further insecurity and uncertainty in HP with the threat of yet more redundancies to come," said Peter Skyte, Unite national officer for IT and communications. "Our aim is to reduce and to avoid compulsory redundancies. The fact that the company still retains nearly 2,000 temporary staff and contractors merely adds insult to injury," he added.

Although Skyte said that it is "too early" to say whether the union members would go on strike in response to the job cuts, he did not rule out industrial action. In April, after a series of strikes and talks through the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) regarding a dispute over pay and redundancies, Public Commercial Services (PCS) union were in the process of finalising the details of a pay and redundancy offer for staff working on the Department for Work and Pensions contract. PCS was unable to provide a status update at the time of writing.
Meanwhile, Skyte warned that the job cuts at HP meant that that fewer people were having to do more work.

"Managers are concerned that they don't have enough people to do the work," he said, saying that work for clients, including Rolls Royce and the Ministry of Defence, could be affected.
Unite also said that workers at HP sites in Bracknell, Bristol, Hook, Erskine, Milton Keynes, London and Warrington are likely to be affected by the jobs cull. Last month, HP was forced to pay BSkyB a total of £318 million in full and final settlement of a high profile lawsuit over a failed CRM implementation by EDS ten years ago.

HP to move work to low-cost offshore locations

IDG/Blooomberg and Businessweek

Hewlett-Packard's Enterprise Services business is counting on automation of its services and an expansion of its strategy to move work to low-cost offshore locations like India, to help cut costs and get more efficient, an executive of the company said on Wednesday.

The roll out of automation is also likely to be more efficient at the company's large offshore centers, said Robb Rasmussen, vice president and general manager for Best Shore Delivery of HP Enterprise Services on Wednesday.

"One of the most optimum places for automation is within an offshore location," Rasmussen said. The roll out of technology to automate a service, and the training of staff can be done more efficiently in these locations, as they have thousands of staff serving a large number of clients, he added. HP said earlier this month that it was cutting 9,000 jobs over three years as it restructures its enterprise services business and automates the services it offers enterprise customers.

Some other companies such as Dell have also said they are introducing automation to make their services more efficient. HP said it would invest US$1 billion in this connection, while also hiring 6,000 staff for the new services initiative, including some in services delivery.

In some offshore locations, including India, HP may however see net additions to the number of staff, Rasmussen said. The company is still hiring in India and some other offshore locations, and does not plan a reduction in staff in these countries, he added.

India is already the second largest location for HP's services business in terms of number of staff.
HP also has a majority-owned services subsidiary in Bangalore, called MphasiS, which became part of the company after its 2008 acquisition of Electronic Data Systems.

As its business grows, HP's enterprise services is having an increasing number of staff in offshore locations, Rasmussen said. The company has 14 offshore services centers across Asia, Eastern Europe and Latin America.

Customers are increasingly opting for an "India plus one" offshore delivery model, which includes near-shore delivery from locations in the customer's time zone, in addition to delivery from India, he added.

Automation will further drive down costs, as key services like applications management will be done with fewer people, Rasmussen said.

Link to article : http://www.businessweek.com/idg/2010-06-23/hp-services-to-cut-costs-by-automation-and-offshore-delivery.html

H.P. Will Cut 9,000 Jobs

HP announced Tuesday that it would cut 9,000 jobs (3678 in EMEA) and take a charge of about $1 billion over several years, as it consolidates and automates data centers. A.P.

During the same time period, H.P. will hire 6,000 new workers in sales and service delivery positions, said Jane McMillian, an H.P. spokeswoman. Under MArk Hurd, the company has shaved costs by regularly cutting large numbers of staff. In 2005, Mr. Hurd cut 15,300 jobs, in part by consolidating the data centers running the company’s own operations.

In 2008, after H.P. acquired Electronic Data Systems, it cut 7.5 percent of the company, or 25,000 people, and reduced the salaries of others by 20 percent in some cases. In May 2009, H.P. announced that it would cut 6,420 people.

Mark Fabbi, a vice president and analyst at Gartner, compared Hewlett’s data center division to factory floor during the Industrial Revolution. “In the Industrial Revolution, they put things on an assembly line and didn’t need those jobs anymore,” he said. “This is the same thing applied to H-P, a hundred years later.”

The company said it would record about half of the $1 billion charge in the third quarter and the rest by the end of fiscal 2013. The layoffs and $1 billion charge will result in savings of $500 million to $700 million a year, the company said.

HP criticized for earnings accounting

Hewlett Packard Playing Games with Earnings CNBC, 06/2 , Herb Greenberg

First, housekeeping: Glad to be back!
Second: My inaugural "Herb on the Street" on CNBC (see video below) focused on whether Hewlett Packard is minding the earnings GAAP.

GAAP, of course, is generally accepted accounting principles. My beef: HP [HPQ 47.27 1.69 (+3.71%) ] presents itself to Wall Street as a non-GAAP company and has decided to exclude a $1 billion charge from non-GAAP earnings.

The issue of GAAP vs. non-GAAP is a longtime, simmering issue on Wall Street and it really gets down to this: Should investors view companies the way the companies want to be viewed or the way GAAP intended them to be viewed?

I say the latter, if the charges are not one-time in nature and are part of an ongoing restructuring/acquisitions strategy, which appears to be the case at HP. Acquisitions, in fact, are a stated part of HP's business strategy. (Note its recent deals to acquire Palm [PALM 5.71 0.05 (+0.88%) ] and 3Com.)

Some background:
* Two years ago, HP acquired EDS, the enterprise services company, for $13.5 billion.
* At the time the company said the deal would be accretive to GAAP earnings in 2010.
* Now the company is taking a $1 billion charge over a multi-year period, but only reporting that charge in GAAP results.

The result, in my opinion: Never mind that it appears EDS won't be GAAP accretive in 2010, it would appear that non-GAAP results will be artificially inflated.
Furthermore, it's easy to see why HP likes to keep the charges out of non-GAAP: Over the past three years, as the accompanying chart shows, non-GAAP earnings per share have beaten GAAP earnings per share.

I'm not the only person who has that view. On a conference call held by HP Monday to discuss a new strategy for its enterprise business, Sanford Bernstein analyst Toni Saccanoghi-who is generally known for asking the tough question-asked why the $1 billion charge would only be included in GAAP.

HP CFO Cathie Lesjak responded, saying, "While business charges in non-GAAP are typically more routine, routine rebalancing of activities and adjustments to changing business conditions. So this is really a structural change."

Perhaps, but as Saccanoghi responded in a note: "Given that HP's actions appear to be strategic in nature, we believe this could (and should) raise questions among investors. We note that HP has taken restructuring charges of more than $50 million in 10 out of the last 20 quarters (and restructuring charges of any magnitude in 17 out of the last 20 quarter) and this current charge may reinvigorate investor debate over HP's use of GAAP vs. non-GAAP earnings."
As well it should-and not just as it pertains to HP.

No. 1 Corporate Citizen !

It's not a joke : Corporate Responsibility Magazine gives HP high marks in environment, human rights, employee relations, philanthropy, and more...

HP took the top spot in Corporate Responsibility Magazine’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens list for 2010, rising from fifth place last year. The list is considered the preeminent of its kind.
“Global citizenship is in our DNA at HP. We hold ourselves to very high standards, so we are very pleased and honored to be recognized for our efforts, particularly by this respected source,” said Gabi Zedlmayer, vice president, Global Social Innovation.

Global citizenship is one of HP’s seven corporate objectives, rooted in the company’s founding values and key to success. While this recognition highlights HP’s most recent accomplishments, global citizenship has influenced how it has run its business for more than 70 years.
“Our work in this realm encompasses HP’s commitment to align our business goals with our impacts on society and the planet,” Zedlmayer continued. “We recognize that our actions can make very real differences in the quality of people’s lives around the world, and we will continue to work toward creating a legacy of real and lasting change.”

How the ranking is determined :

The 100 Best Corporate Citizens List is based on more than 360 data points of publicly available information in seven categories, weighted as follows:
Environment — 19.5%
Climate Change — 16.5%
Human Rights — 16%
Employee Relations — 19.5%
Governance — 7%
Philanthropy — 9%
Financial — 12.5%

HP faces strikes in England. Again !

March 22 (Bloomberg and San Francisco Business Times)

The Public and Commercial Services Union said up to 1,000 members working for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Services will take a further four days of strike action in a dispute over pay and job security.

Workers at Hewlett-Packard Co. plants in the north of England plan for four days of strikes, starting next week. The Public and Commercial Services Union, based in London and representing some 300,000 members in the United Kingdom, said as many as 1,000 of its members will strike for four days at HP plants. Workers at some of the sites have already walked off the job for two days earlier this month.

Work stoppages are planned for March 29 and 30 and for April 6 and 7. They'll affect plants formerly run by Electronic Data Systems, which is now owned by HP. The plants are in Newcastle, Washington, Preston, Lytham St. Annes and Norcross.

"There has been growing anger amongst staff since HP took over EDS ... with 3,400 staff already axed across the UK. Staff have been further angered by the imposition of a pay freeze last year and for 2010 despite the company delivering record revenues worth billions of dollars," the union said. Mark Sewotka, the general secretary of the union, said employees at the HP plants felt "betrayed. "Hewlett-Packard bought Plano, Texas-based EDS in 2008 for $13.9 billion and laid off some 25,000 of its workers. Last September, HP renamed the unit HP Enterprise Services. Perennial presidential gadfly H. Ross Perot started EDS in 1962.

Major strike in UK

Computerworld

More than 1,000 HP staff in the Public and Commercial Services Union are set to strike tomorrow after talks to resolve a dispute over pay and job cuts broke down. HP Enterprise Services workers taking part in the strike include those based in Newcastle, Washington, Preston and the Fylde Coast. The action will target four sites working mainly on IT contracts for the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and General Motors.

The workers' complaint centres on a pay freeze imposed for this and next year, as well as on the 3,400 EDS staff who have been made redundant since HP took over the company in 2008, and the 1,000 job losses planned for the first half of this year. Mark Serwotka, PCS general secretary, said: "Strike action is not a step that our members take lightly. They have worked hard to help the company deliver fourth quarter revenues of $30.8 billion yet have been slapped in the face with job losses and a pay freeze for two years running." Jim Hanson, national officer at PCS, said that the main disagreement with HP's offer is over pay, with HP offering to only remove the pay freeze for two years, rather than permanently. Also, Hanson said that HP is refusing to recognise staff they hired directly as being part of the PCS talks, despite them also being members.

According to HP, 288 union members rejected the company's latest offer and voted to continue with the planned strike. "We are disappointed to confirm that a small number of employees have voted in favour of local industrial action on Friday. A reasonable offer was put on the table by HP, in response to the union's requests, however this was rejected without a counter offer being proposed by the union," HP said. "We will continue to maintain a dialogue with the union in an attempt to avoid any further form of action." The company also said that it has put a plan in place to deal with the impact of the strike action, including reducing non-urgent project work and moving resources to prioritise critical work.

In December, HP narrowly avoided a strike by PCS members by agreeing to sit down to talks at the eleventh hour. HP was then due to meet with the union on December 16 to try and reach a settlement for workers. Last week, HP averted nine strike days that were due to be undertaken by customer service engineers in its CDS business, by agreeing to a confidential deal on pay and pensions with trade unions. Computerworld UK understands that this agreement addressed some of the employee concerns around the potential scrapping of a £2,000 performance bonus scheme and a final salary pensions. However, neither HP nor the Unite trade union gave details of these discussions.

HP faces strike action in UK over pay and pensions

V3.co.uk,

The UK's largest trade union Unite is balloting members working at HP on strike action after the company changed the status of some of its engineers and support specialists. The union announced the action over the company's planned changes in staffing rules, which would see 150 employees of HP IT services shifted to jobs at HP CDS, which would see them losing final salary pension schemes and performance benefits worth around £2,000.

"Our members face cuts to their pay and pensions and have no choice other than to begin an industrial action ballot. This is the latest in a series of attacks by the company on our members' pay and conditions, while senior executives and shareholders do very well indeed,' said Peter Skyte, a Unite national officer. "Unite remains willing to seek a resolution to this dispute with HP but not on the basis that one employee's pay cut results in a HP executive's pay and bonus increase.'

In its last financial report HP reported profits of £973 million for the quarter, and said that European demand was lower than any other major market. The company has already confirmed it is cutting some of its UK staff but hasn't confirmed numbers, although Unite expects 850 jobs to go. It has also cut back on staff at EDS and has repeatedly cut salaries for those staff still employedUnite has become increasingly active in the IT sphere, taking on IBM and Fujitsu over pensions and job losses.

If the ballot is successful it will be the first time HP has faced a British strike.

EDS staff voting on strike action in UK

Computerworld : staff at EDS, who are now employed by HP, are voting in a strike ballot as they express their “anger” over upcoming job losses.

Most of the 1,000 staff, who are members of the PCS union, work on a series of IT contracts at the Department for Work and Pensions that are worth £3 billion and run until 2015. They work in locations around the UK, including Newcastle, Washington, Preston and the Fylde Coast, on areas including desktop and datacentre management, and application maintenance and support.

There had been “growing anger” among the staff since HP bought EDS in 2008, the union said. Their complaint centres on the 1,000 job losses planned for the first half of next year, as well as a pay freeze, a growing workload, and voluntary salary cuts. Some 3,400 staff have already been made redundant since the takeover.

The PCS ballot offers staff the chance to vote on a series of strikes of one or two days, as well as action that falls short of a strike. Staff have until 30 November to vote. Mark Serwotka, PCS general secretary, said: "There has been growing anger amongst staff who are facing yet more uncertainty about their future.” While employees had been “contributing significantly to HP’s revenue” and taking on more work, “their reward is more job cuts, imposed pay freezes and pleas from the company to take a voluntary pay cut”, he said.

Serwotka urged HP workers to tell their managers that “enough is enough". In a statement, HP said it “respects the rights of its employees” to be part of a union and would continue dialogue with the aim of avoiding a strike.

HP is facing a stike ballot on another front, regarding 150 of its service engineers, who mainly work from home and in the field. Those workers are complaining of a reduction of pay and benefits, and the result of their vote is expected in the next few days.

Elsewhere, rival Fujitsu narrowly avoided a three day stike last week, after the Unite union said there had been some progress in discussions on pay and job cuts. But the situation is not resolved and the union did not rule out further strike action.

Is there a Board ?

TheStreet.com

Mark Hurd was brought in to take the helm at Hewlett-Packard in 2005. He's well regarded by Wall Street for turning the company from a bureaucratic has-been to a market leader again. In the first 2 1/2 years of Hurd's tenure as leader, HP's stock increased 137%. For the last two years, however, HP's stock performance has been mediocre, dropping 5%. Although that was better than the Nasdaq, it tracked that index very closely over that period

While Hurd deserves credit for turning this company around in the early part of his tenure by slashing costs and increasing focus, there are some very troubling aspects about how he, his management team and his board approach executive compensation and governance that suggest investors should steer clear of this Silicon Valley icon until it gets its act together.

Although HP's performance has hit the wall in the past two years, Hurd's pay -- and the pay of his management team members -- has dramatically increased. For 2008, Hurd's total compensation reached $43 million, which made him the fourth highest paid CEO in America for 2008. Hurd's total compensation increased 73% from his $25 million in 2007, even though HP's stock price declined 29% in 2008.

On his senior management team, the sharp compensation increases in 2008 were also noteworthy. CIO Randy Mott's total compensation went up 400% last year to $28 million. Imaging EVP VJ Joshi's total compensation jumped 83% to $22 million. Personal Systems EVP Todd Bradley's total compensation jumped 263% to $21 million. Technology Solutions' EVP Ann Livermore enjoyed a 31% bump in total compensation to $21 million. And CFO Catherine Lesjak got a 49% increase in total compensation to a more modest $6 million.

What also raises eyebrows about these sharp executive raises, aside from it happening in the face of a sharp stock price drop for the year (and the general market uncertainty which remained at the end of the year), is that 2008 was also a year in which these same leaders imposed mandatory 10% pay cuts for other executives and 5% cuts for the rest of HP's workforce. It hardly seems like this select group is shouldering the pain like the rest of the employees.

At Dell, the magnitude and the general direction of total compensation were far different than HP for 2008. Michael Dell's total comp dropped 9% in 2008 from the previous year to $2 million. Other senior executives on Dell's management team decreased or modestly increased to an average total compensation for the year of $9.5 million -- or less than half of what their HP counterparts took home for the year.

But what should be most rankling to HP shareholders -- and a very good reason to avoid the stock in the near term, as it speaks to the values by which this board and management team operate -- are the perks these executives are asking for and receiving from the board.For example, last year HP shareholders paid $7,472 for travel expenses related to Mark Hurd's family accompanying him to business meetings. Expenses for Hurd's security service roughly doubled to $256,000. Shareholders paid $500,000 combined in 2007 and 2008 for legal fees associated with bringing over CIO Randy Mott from arch-rival Dell. All senior executives availed themselves of about $18,000 worth of financial advice in 2008 (about four times the amount Dell senior executives received that same year).

Perhaps the biggest bonus for being an HP senior executive is getting access to the fleet of corporate jets for personal use. Shareholders forked over $136,000 for Mark Hurd's personal use of the aircraft in 2008. Todd Bradley's personal use of the aircraft cost $128,000 in 2008, which was actually down from $327,000 worth of personal travel in 2007.
HP explains in its proxy filing that for "purposes of reporting the value of such personal usage in this table, HP uses data provided by an outside firm to calculate the hourly cost of operating each type of aircraft. These costs include the cost of fuel, maintenance, landing and parking fees, crew and catering and supplies."

I think it's completely unacceptable for shareholders to pay for this personal use perk. However, this explanation left me with more questions about these numbers. Who is this outside firm that provided this estimated hourly cost? What in fact was the hourly cost? How do shareholders know that the hourly cost was a fair market rate? Finally, what were these personal trips?I'm not even sure how it's possible for Todd Bradley to have racked up $327,000 worth of personal travel in 2007. Did he have time to show up for work that year? Call me a conspiracy theorist but isn't it possible that this outside firm vastly under-stated the actual (fair market) hourly cost of using these aircraft for personal use? How will shareholders actually know unless the company releases the flight logs and numbers ?

Dell and his senior executives charged no personal use of their aircraft to its shareholders.A later footnote in the proxy filing for Hurd's personal travel says that the first 25 hours of personal travel are included and are "grossed up." Hurd owes taxes on the value of that perk, but HP's board has decided that HP shareholders should pay Hurd's taxes instead of Hurd.The same footnote later says that if Hurd's spouse is "requested by HP" to travel with Hurd, then the company "grosses up" that amount, too. The internal process that goes on in determining the company request is not described. It could be as simple as Mark Hurd leaning over and saying to his assistant: "I'd like to go play golf in Hawaii this weekend with the CEO of one of our clients on business. Can you write me a quick email saying that, on behalf of HP, you're requesting that my wife fly with me?"

And don't forget the minor scandal the erupted last January, when blogger Michelle Leder of Footnoted noticed that HP had "grossed up" Hurd $79,814 for taxes he paid on meals involving his family. (Ann Livermore and VJ Joshi also got "grossed up" $10,000 apiece for meals with their families.)

Michelle estimated that, to receive a "gross-up" of this amount, Hurd and his family would have had to run up food bills during the year of more than $243,000. HP protested, saying it had made an error in its calculations and even refiled its proxy with the SEC. Magically, Hurd's "gross-ups" for his family meals shrunk to $3,285. HP's error and refiling could have simply been a decision on its part, based on the angry reaction of employees and shareholders, for Hurd and all executives to simply cover these meals and their taxes themselves. Let's face it: It wouldn't have been a hardship for any of them based on their compensation last year.I don't mind pay for performance. I do mind pay for non-performance and I mind perks for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. And in a year of across the board pay cuts? Where is their shame?The board is equally or more to blame of course. After all, they approved all this. I was particularly surprised to note that Ken Thompson has served on the HP board for three years now.

Thompson is one of the most disgraced CEOs coming out of the financial crisis.He ended up destroying the fifth largest bank in America, Wachovia, by pushing it heavily into the area of subprime mortgages. When you destroy a company with $8 billion in annual profits, you shouldn't have the right to continue serving as a director and get $300,000 a year for doing so.
It was announced last week that Web pioneer Marc Andreesen would join HP's board. I hope he can help reform the company's governance, but I don't think it's likely. In 2006, Andreesen sold his company Opsware to HP for $1.6 billion -- making him indirectly beholden to Hurd and the rest of the board for his payday. That means Andreesen will likely be another voice around the table tacitly approving whatever Hurd wants to do and pay himself.

Disclosure: At the time of publication, Jackson did not hold any positions in the companies mentioned.

HP's Salary Cuts Forcing Out EDS Employees in the US

"...Employees were prepared for salary cuts between 2 1/2 percent to 5 percent. Last Feburary, former EDS employees had their salaries sliced by hp by 2 1/2 percent. In April, more cuts with salaries slashed another 10 percent, that 10 percent figure was restored a month later but the email received by the employee this time indicates nothing surgical in the wage cut.

"My pay is being reduced a total of 29 percent, 20 percent effected Sept. 1, the additional 9 percent effective Sept. 1, 2010," the man said. That's nearly a 32 percent salary cut for one employee in two years time -- more than one-third of his base salary. The cuts push him back to the salary he earned working the same job in the same building more than 10 years ago. Other former EDS employees said that under Hewlett Packard, they've experienced salary cuts of between 10 percent and 47 percent.

A spokesperson for Hewlett Packard said not all former EDS employees face wage cuts and that the salary realignment," enables hp to effectively drive its pay for performance strategy with a consistent job-based foundation for rewards, development and organization planning," said an hp spokesperson...."

http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/tech/HPs-Huge-Salary-Cuts-Forcing-Out-Old-EDS-Employees-52485672.html

See also : EDS workers face more pay cuts

HP/EDS management cannot muzzle workers’ representatives

UNI-Europa and EMF members in HP/EDS are extremely concerned about the management’s attempt to take advantage of the current crisis to undertake offshoring to low-cost countries.

The new EWC Directive strengthens communication between EWC members and the workers they represent. HP/EDS management claims that dialogue with the EWC is indeed a priority and that it respects the applicable laws with regard to information and consultation of workers. In reality however, the workers’ representatives in the EWC cannot exercise their representative functions since they are denied the right to report back to the workers they represent. It is clear that HP/EDS management is simply paying lip service to the Directive and this is totally unacceptable to the UNI-Europa and EMF trade union representatives who gathered in Brussels recently.

HP/EDS management is not willing to develop a constructive social dialogue at European or national levels. There has been much evidence from different countries in recent weeks to show that it is only prepared to enter discussions when trade unions start taking legal steps or mobilising workers. This attitude is really regrettable and leads to frustration and anger among the European workforce.

They stress that the company’s growth is no longer geared to R&D or an innovative industrial strategy, which again puts the long-term viability of HP/EDS at stake.

UNI-Europa and EMF will again approach central management, urging it to allow workers’ representatives to effectively fulfil their duties towards the workers they represent and ensure effective information and consultation processes.

The two organisations will ask the EU Commission to investigate this case further. European trade union coordination will evidently be maintained and further protest actions will be envisaged.

_________
Press 28/2009
The EMF is the representative body defending the interests of workers in the European metal industry. UNI-Europa is the European trade union organisation for skills and services.
For further information please contact:
Isabelle Barthès, EMF Policy Advisor on Company Policy +32(0)2 227 10 12
Gerd Rohde, UNI-Europa + 41 792 02 19 28

HP cuts salaries

http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/084/1051084/hewlett-packard-cuts-salaries

"The math is pretty straight forward. From a productivity standpoint, you’re supposed to reduce headcount on par with declining revenue. If you believe the environment isn’t going to improve, you should take a bigger cut to get in front of the problems. You can do the calculation, as easy as I can. We have about 100,000 people in our product businesses, with revenue down roughly 20%, and an environment that may not get any better in 2009.I’ll be asked by investors, “Where’s the job action, where are you taking out this roughly, 20,000 positions?” Well, I don’t want to do that. When I look at HP, I don’t see a structural problem of that magnitude. There are pockets where restructuring needs to happen, and areas where actions will be taken as part of our ongoing workforce optimization process. But at a company-wide level, I don’t believe a major workforce reduction is the best thing for HP at this time."
...
Mark Hurd

Huge strike of EDS workers in Germany

At the beginning of December 2008, management was asked to enter into negotiations in respect of a collective agreement for EDS in Germany covering the following three main issues:
1. A collective labour agreement, including guarantees regarding the future of existing sites
2. A collective agreement to secure existing working conditions
3. A pay increase for 2009

Four warning strikes have been organised by the unions at all German EDS OS location since February 2009 following management’s refusal to negotiate. A meeting between management and trade union representatives was actually held on 28 April but no headway was made regarding the negotiations.

The result of last week’s strike ballot conducted by IG Metall and ver.di, the two German trade unions concerned, was overwhelmingly in favour of a full-scale strike : 96,55% EDS OS employees participated in the ballot, 91,92% voted in favour ! The strike starts on 4 June. The EMF supports the current struggle by the EDS OS workers and calls on affiliates, in order to increase the pressure on the company management and avoid any strike-breaking measures:
· to send messages of support to the unions and works councils
· to ensure that EDS and HP employees working in Europe do not accept any activities that may be transferred from Germany.

We wish the EDS-OS workers every success in their legitimate struggle.

In solidarity,

Yours fraternally,

Peter SCHERRER
General Secretary

EMF

Switzerland: a letter of union Kommunikation to HP requesting social dialogue

Bern, 27. Mai 2009

Aufforderung zur Aufnahme des sozialen Dialogs mit der ANV und der Gewerkschaft Kommunikation

Sehr geehrter Herr Kryhlmand

Wir haben zur Kenntnis genommen, dass HP sich bereit erklärt hat die zukünftigen Arbeitsbedingungen gegenüber den EDS Mitarbeitenden zu verbessern. Gleichwohl stellen wir mit Bedauern fest, dass sich HP weigert, auf die Vorschläge der ANV für die Erarbeitung eines Gesamtarbeitsvertrages einzutreten und zudem das Vertretungsrecht der Gewerkschaft Kommunikation in Abrede stellt. Dies, obwohl an der gemeinsamen Aussprache vom 16. März 2009 das Vertretungs­recht der Gewerkschaft Kommunikation von Ihrer Seite nicht bestritten war.

Wie bereits im Rahmen des Konsultationsverfahren von Seiten der ANV und der Gewerkschaft Kommunikation festgehalten worden ist, müssen wir erneut feststellen, dass HP offenbar weder an einem konstruktiven Dialog zur Verbesserung der Arbeitsbedingungen noch an einer nachhaltigen Sicherung der Arbeitsplätze in der Schweiz interessiert ist. Wie aus den Verlautbarungen Ihres Unternehmens zu entnehmen ist, genügen HP/EDS die 10-prozentigen Kosteneinsparungen im Rahmen der angekündigten Massenentlassungen nicht. Durch die von HP/EDS vorgeschlagenen Massnahmen zur Festlegung der neuen Arbeitsbedingungen – nach der erfolgten Übernahme von EDS durch HP – sollen offensichtlich weitere Sparmassnahmen auf Kosten der Beschäftigten erfolgen, indem die Arbeitsbedingungen verschlechtert werden.

Die von der ANV eingereichten Eckwerte für die Verhandlungen bezüglich der zukünftigen Arbeitsbedingungen bei HP sind von HP/EDS allesamt zurückgewiesen worden, ohne eine inhaltliche Diskussion zu führen. Es geht nicht an, dass die Arbeitsbedingungen in der Schweiz weniger sozialen Schutz bieten als in den anderen HP-Niederlassungen in Europa. Es liegt auf der Hand, dass bei weiteren Restrukturierungen HP dort Personal abbauen wird, wo die kleinsten sozialen Kosten für die Unternehmung entstehen. Für ein Unternehmen, das am öffentlichen Beschaffungswesen der Schweiz partizipiert, ist dies eine nicht tolerierbare Haltung.

In Absprache mit der ANV ersuchen wir Sie, uns einen Besprechungstermin zu unterbreiten für die Aufnahme eines sozialen Dialoges. Das Ziel des sozialen Dialoges ist es, einen Prozess einzuleiten der zur Verbesserung der zukünftigen Arbeitsbedingungen im Rahmen eines Gesamtarbeitvertrages beiträgt.

Sollte sich HP weigern, auf den sozialen Dialog mit der ANV und der Gewerkschaft Kommunikation einzutreten – und zwar ohne Vorbedingungen –, werden wir entsprechende gewerkschaftspolitische Massnahmen ins Auge fassen. Wir sind überzeugt, dass eine sozialverträgliche und nachhaltige Lösung im gegenseitigen Interesse ist.

Mit freundlichen Grüssen


Giorgio Pardini
Vizepräsident Gewerkschaft Kommunikation

- Kopie geht an:
- die ANV EDS
- KV Schweiz,Zürich, Hr. Benedikt Gschwind
- Uniglobal Union, Nyon, Hr. Gerd Rhode

HP confirms UK job cut rumours

VNUNet, 5/28,

HP has confirmed rumours that it plans to axe thousands of jobs, after protests by UK trade union Unite. The company has submitted a proposal to its European Works Council to cut over 5,700 staff in EMEA. HP has around 80,000 employees in the region.

HP is also set to offshore its enterprise, storage and server production plants in Scotland and Germany to a partner in the Czech Republic by 2010. Although HP will not comment on exactly how many UK workers will be affected, Unite puts the figure at around 850. Staff were informed of the news today, and a report from Unite was released shortly afterwards informing the public of the cuts. Unite has condemned HP's decision to move manufacturing jobs offshore, pointing to HP's profit of £1.1bn in the most recent quarter. Unite has also called on the UK government and Scottish Parliament to increase investment in the UK's manufacturing sector. "Westminster offers no meaningful investment, and Holyrood does not even recognise manufacturing as a key plank of its economic plan," said Unite Scottish regional secretary John Quigley. "When over £900bn of public funds can be poured into bailing out the banks, it is utterly unacceptable that help cannot be directed into a sector that is fundamental to nurturing our economic revival."

Downing Street responded by listing ways in which it is helping manufacturers through the global downturn, such as the Enterprise Finance Guarantee that supports £1.3bn of lending to small businesses, the HMRC Business Payment Support Service that allows companies to defer paying tax, and the Manufacturing Advisory Service that offers advice on cost savings. "We know how tough it is for manufacturers. Our manufacturing is bearing the brunt of the global downturn because it is deeply integrated into global supply chains, and supplies global markets," said a spokesman for the Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.

Meanwhile, HP's offshore move was questioned today by the Scottish Parliament. The plant, based in Erkskine, employs 1,300 people, more than half of whom are likely to lose their jobs."This is a company which has made a profit of some £5.2bn in 2008 due in part to the hard work of the men and women in my constituency in Erskine," said Labour MSP Trish Godman, according to an Associated Press report.HP recently announced plans to cut its global workforce of over 320,000 by two per cent, in addition to previously imposing a five per cent pay cut across all operations.

Does H.P. Need a Dose of Anarchy?

A must read : New-York Times article on HP and Mark hurd

Another 6,400 workers to lose jobs at HP

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- Hewlett-Packard Co. is cutting 6,400 more workers -- or 2 percent of the company's total work force.

It will come over the next year as part of HP's huge acquisition of Electronic Data Systems.
Palo Alto, Calif.-based HP was already dumping 24,600 workers as part of that acquisition before announcing the extra cuts Tuesday.

The announcement came in a conference call with analysts to discuss HP's fiscal second-quarter results.

HP's profit dropped 17 percent to $1.72 billion, while sales fell 3 percent to $27.4 billion, in the latest period.

Solidarity @ HP/EDS

On this new site, you will find a UNI/EMF Blog for HP and EDS employees

UNI is the Global Union for skills and services.We represent 900 trade unions and 20 million workers worldwide

The EMF is the representative body defending the interests of workers in the European metal industry. The EMF has a mandate for the external representation and coordination of the metalworkers' unions and a mandate to engage in bargaining at European level.

Recent topics :

The hard fight for a company agreement with EDS in Germany
Prime Minister write to Volker Smid

HP, IBM, Sun Execs Blast Obama's Protectionist Policy

Information Week :

While touring India this week, execs from Hewlett-Packard, IBM, and Sun criticized the Obama administration's anti-outsourcing policies as unrealistic, claiming they fly in the face of the global economy and will not produce positive results.

Noting that HP has far-flung labs in India, Costa Rica, and Europe, HP senior VP Marius Haas said, "It’s a competitive economy and you go where the talent is," according to the Economic Times of India. Haas, who leads HP's ProCurve business, also said, "The local sourcing push by the U.S. administration is unlikely to be effective in a globalised world."

IBM's Edward Orange, emphasizing that IBM manufactures products and delivers services in 170 countries, echoed Haas's point: "IBM goes wherever the talent and the market is." Orange is the Asia-Pacific director for IBM's Lotus unit, the article said.

Sun's Joe Hartley was even more blunt: "The policy may shrink global trade in the long run. Not every job can be outsourced. But a job has to be done at the right place and at the right time," according to the Economic Times, which also offered these statistics:

Indian subsidiaries of U.S. companies such as IBM, Sun, Microsoft, Oracle, and HP together employ over 150,000 people. IBM, which has more than 70,000 employees in India, sees no merit in U.S. government’s protectionist policies.

HP hits UK workers with canteen, car, pension cuts

The Register :

Hewlett-Packard and EDS employees in the UK who are currently bracing themselves for pay cuts can now expect to see food subsidies axed, a pension scheme shake-up and changes to their car allowances.

HP told workers yesterday in a memo seen by The Register that prices in the company’s canteens would be jacked up, fewer meal choices would be on offer and a review of opening hours at some sites was also underway. It said the changes to its restaurant facilities would come into effect on 30 March. Meanwhile, HP is also consulting with employee reps about possible changes to the company’s various retirement plans for both HP and EDS staff. It has proposed that its HP Plan (HP and Digital Sections) and EDS Retirement Plan final salary pension arrangements could see changes that mean either an “increased cost to employees or a reduction in future benefit accrual”.

In addition the firm is considering a reduction in its contribution to the HP pension scheme.
HP revealed its latest efforts to keep a lid on costs as it continues to undergo a painful restructuring strategy involving the loss of thousands of jobs worldwide. In the memo penned by HP UK and Ireland managing director Steve Gill and EDS regional vice president Sean Finnan, the company also reiterated its pay cut plans that were first announced last month. HP said it’s seeking consent from senior managers and all EDS “pay-banded” staff to agree to salary reductions of between 2.5 and 15 per cent by 20 April. Those 700 or so UK-based employees who accept the pay cut will see changes brought in on 1 May.

The company plans to then move to a second round of salary reductions in June in which it will ask all employees in the UK to consent to a pay cut that will be effective from 1 September this year. Late last week HP confirmed its EDS employees in the US and Puerto Rico would have their base salaries cut an additional ten per cent for April 2009 only.

It admitted some workers would temporarily suffer a second drop in pay to help HP execs steer the services outfit through tough economic conditions. UK's largest union Unite slammed the move describing it as "trigger happy management actions more akin to the Wild West in the 19th century".

HP chief faces tough questions at annual meeting

HP chief executive Mark Hurd underwent a grilling from investors at the company's annual general meeting this week.

Hurd faced questions on increased competition in the server space, after Cisco's announcement that it is entering the market in partnership with VMware, and rumours that IBM may buy Sun Microsystems. The HP chief claimed that he was unconcerned by the Cisco move, and refused to comment on the speculation about IBM and Sun."I do not remember a day where the market wasn't competitive. I think you'll continue to see competition in the market," Hurd told the meeting. "I couldn't be more confident in the future of HP."

The agenda for the meeting contained just two official items: the re-election of board members; and the choice of a new accounting firm. Hurd then faced questions from shareholders, one of which concerned his own pay, and in particular the $42m (£29m) bonus he has received. Hurd said that figure was tied to HP's performance over the past three years, and that he did not expect to make as much in the coming years.

Another question concerned how Apple, a company with a research and development budget one third the size of HP's, could have a better market capitalisation. Hurd maintained that Apple was very competitive, and said that he is researching ways to bring more technology to market from HP Labs over the coming year.

H-P shareholders give board members another term MarketWatch, 3/18

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Hewlett-Packard Co. shareholders on Wednesday voted at the company's annual meeting to give the ten members of the company's board of directors each another one-year term. The board members are H-P Chief Executive Mark Hurd, Lawrence Babbio, Sari Baldauf, Rajiv Gupta, John Hammergren, Joel Hyatt, John Joyce, Robert Ryan, Lucille Salhany and G. Kennedy Thompson. Board member Richard Hackborn chose to not stand for re-election. H-P shareholders also approved Ernst & Young as the company's independent public accountant.

NO !

TO ALL EDS / HP PERSONNEL

The common trade union front at HP / EDS call upon you not to accept the individual request for salary reduction.

It is unacceptable that:
- the local unions were not informed.
- the employer addresses individual employees.
- the need for this reduction is unclear and on top of the serious restructuring currently in progress at EDS.
- nothing is given in return (eg. Guarantee on job security, temporary aspect of the measure, -sacrificed pay must eventually return to the employees,…).

You can’t be forced to accept this salary reduction, you have the right to refuse without motivating why.

Management confirms that saying NO to the individual request for reduction will not have negative consequences for the individual.

Above point of view will further be commented on the employee meeting of 9 March.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have additional questions or comments.

Common Trade Union Front EDS & HP
ACLVB BBTK LBC-NVK

Belgium

HP/EDS “frozen day” was a success throughout Europe

Press release

The second European action day jointly organized by UNI-Europa and the EMF
throughout the continent to protest against HP/EDS restructuring plan, and its
consequent salary freeze, benefit cuts and redundancies proved to be a success. The
action was named “frozen day” in reference to the announced salary freeze.

In Germany, actions were organized in virtually all locations with staff meetings
reaching 100% participation in certain places. More than 900 employees gathered in
Rüsselsheim while the Bremen steelworks account was left empty. Workers in
Ludwigsburg used their lunch break to meet with their colleagues in Böblingen to discuss
the situation.

Smaller meetings also attracted a lot of interest as the one in the Sal Oppenheim
subsidiary. In Schweinfurt, IT employees from the former SKF even gave a hand to their
colleagues to organise the demonstration. Under the motto “Yes to HP, but only if
everyone is included” the action day received very good press and TV coverage in the
country.

Unfortunately, EDS management refused negotiations for a collective bargaining
agreement on job security, safeguarding of current terms and conditions of employment
and pay increase. On the contrary, they threatened the workers’ council with the closure
of other locations. This lead ver.di and IG Metall to call for a joint strike at 14 German
sites on February 10th.

Links to videos on strike in Germany (10.02.09):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_xHJdS8uqw&NR=1 (HR) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OI5IhE2O1Y&feature=channel_page (RTL) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rcb3SZB55ns (Wuppertal) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAOdWlvUdag&feature=related (Ludwigsburg)

This action was supported by Spanish colleagues from EDS group of Comisiones
Obreras (CCOO COMFIA) who sent a solidarity letter in which they declare that “such a
reduction of labor entails dangerous levels of stress among workers and jeopardizes the
quality of service provided to customers and thus the business of this company”.

In France, a major demonstration was organised on January 29th in different cities. It
proved to be very uniting since workers from HP, IBM and EDS walked together under a
common banner to fight the antisocial policies of their employers with all trade unions
involved. The strike got very good media coverage with a major French TV relaying the
event in Paris.

In Belgium, a protest was held on Friday morning in front HP building in Diegem
addressing a number of open issues (workforce reduction, salary freeze, EDS integration,
social plan ...). Delegations from HP CDS, EDS and other HP sites joined to form a group
of 200 people. In the afternoon a meeting which was agreed prior to action took place
between union reps and HP management and resulted in an agreement on the HP social
plan.

In the UK, tech workers asked for “no compulsory redundancies” while union members
demonstrated outside the company site in Bristol. The union Unite said the “credit
crunch is not the problem. Short termist greed is the issue”.

Two strikes were organised at HP/EDS Italy during January in cities like Milan, Rome
and Bari. Although the participation rate reached 95% in certain cases, management
didn’t react.

More than 160 employees from HP and EDS jointly attended, physically or by phone, a
one hour meeting held by HP management in Austria after an action day took place at
HP’s headquarters in the country. Both EDS and HP’s works councils decided to work
together in order to solve common issues on frozen salaries, bonuses and allowances.

When it comes to Sweden, HP corporate management announced that the firm will cut
compensations and benefits but the bonus programs are maintained. The Swedish Union
Unionen can't accept this state of fact and is asking to meet with the management in
order to discuss bonus programs, the use of external consultants and the maintenance of
employment benefits.

As for the Netherlands, the union FNV Bondgenoten is examining the reduction plans
after a satisfactory agreement was reached regarding a social plan and expressed its full
solidarity with all the above mentioned actions.



Finally, it has also to be said that workers in Hungary are suffering job losses due to the
closure of several EDS centres in the country.
___________
EMF is the representative body defending the interests of workers in the European metal
industry.
UNI-Europa is the European trade union organisation for skills and services.
For further information please contact:
Isabelle Barthès, EMF Policy Advisor on Company Policy +32(0)2 227 10 12
Gerd Rohde, UNI-Europa + 41 792 02 19 28

High Tech Misery in China, HP involved

The Dehumanization of Young Workers Producing Our Computer Keyboards

"We feel like we are serving prison sentences.”

A must read !

Hurd got pay valued at $42.5 million or $34 million in '08, depending on how you calculate...

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) --

Hurd, 52, saw the value of his compensation in fiscal 2008 jump 31 percent over the previous year, according to AP calculations. The increase reflects the prosperous period HP enjoyed before the economic meltdown hammered the stock and cut into HP's profit.

Hurd also exercised $10 million worth of stock options and had $15.7 million worth of HP stock vest during the period, according to a regulatory filing Tuesday by the Palo Alto, Calif.-based technology company.

The biggest chunk of Hurd's raise came from cash incentives based on HP's performance during the 2008 fiscal year, which ended Oct. 31 and was a banner year for the company. For the year, HP's profit rose 15 percent to $8.3 billion, while sales climbed 13 percent to $118.4 billion. Those were big gains for a company the size of HP, which has faced questions from Wall Street about its ability to continue improving sales and profit margins at a steady clip.

Hurd, who joined HP in 2005 to engineer a major turnaround after the rocky reign of former CEO Carly Fiorina, has answered by aggressively cutting costs and positioning the company as a bigger challenger to IBM Corp. through the $13.9 billion acquisition of technology services provider Electronic Data Systems.

At the end of 2005, HP had sales of $86.7 billion and profit of $2.4 billion. When the company's current round of job cuts is complete -- HP is slashing 24,600 positions, nearly 8 percent of its 320,000 workers -- Hurd will have cut nearly 40,000 jobs in two big rounds of layoffs since he took the job. Under Hurd's watch, HP has also regained its title of world's biggest personal computer manufacturer from Dell Inc., though Dell has been stealing some of that ground back with a new retail strategy.

Hurd's changes have helped HP's bottom line but they did little to soothe investors' nerves in 2008, when HP's stock price bounced around before falling off sharply in September and October as the financial crisis worsened. The stock lost more than 25 percent of its value during the fiscal year. Many analysts say HP is vulnerable to the slowdown because of its exposure to the ailing consumer market through its personal computers and lucrative printer ink, and because it relies heavily on hardware sales, which have suffered as companies freeze information-technology spending.

Still, Hurd was rewarded in 2008 for steering the company to "exceptional and sustained" financial performance in his first three full years on the job. Hurd pulled down $23.9 million in performance-based cash bonuses in 2008, according to the filing, which was almost twice as much as the $13.3 million in cash bonuses he snagged in 2007.

Hurd, 52, was also rewarded with $7.9 million worth of stock-based compensation during the period, nearly $3 million less than in 2007. Hurd's compensation package also included more than $738,000 worth of additional compensation for things like: home security ($256,000), personal use of HP's corporate jet ($135,734) and a $71,000 mortgage subsidy Hurd is guaranteed for relocation expenses under his employment agreement.
Hurd's salary of $1.45 million increased only slightly over 2007.

HP also revealed in its proxy filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that Richard Hackborn, an instrumental figure in building HP's printer division who served 33 years with HP before retiring in 1993, has decided not to stand for re-election to the board of directors at HP's annual shareholder meeting set for March 18. Hackborn has been an HP director since 1992.
The Associated Press' calculations of total pay includes salary, bonus, incentives, perks, above-market returns on deferred compensation and the estimated value of stock options and awards granted during the year. The calculations exclude changes in the present value of pension benefits, and they sometimes differ from the totals companies list in the summary compensation table of proxy statements filed with the SEC.

In comments : depending on how you calculate, Hurd saw the value of his compensation in fiscal 2008 jump 68 percent over the previous year to $42.5 million !

Enough !

Mark Hurd to employees, November 24th : "We will take aggressive action on discretionary spending…And we’ll implement a number of cost saving initiatives that are going to be tough and that some people aren’t going to like…"

And now, the list of actions on "discretionary spending" :

- There will be no salary increases, except where legally required
- EAwards are suspended
- Comprehensive benefit reviews are continuing on a country-by-country basis to harmonize HP and EDS offerings based on market practice.
- Recognition and learning & development programs are also affected
...

Huge success of the first European action day in HP and EDS on 13th November

European Metalworkers’ Federation and UNI-Europa call for
mobilisation throughout Europe

Today, HP and EDS the trade unions and the workers have demonstrated their determination to reject the management plans to downsize the workforce and cutback the terms and conditions in HP/EDS by successfully mobilising and undertaking protest action in most of the European countries where HP and EDS have locations.

In Germany, workers and works councils’ meetings have been organised during three consecutive days.
In Austria, workers’ assemblies took place in front of headquarters in Vienna.
In Belgium as well as in Sweden, information meetings for workers have been organised during working hours in the different sites. Leaflets, pamphlets, badges and campaign material have been distributed.
In Spain, workers rallied in front of the different EDS buildings for 15 minutes.
In Italy, in the wake of the protest actions organised on 21 October, a two hour strike took place in the sites of Rome and Napoli. Flyers were also distributed to the population.
In the United Kingdom, actions to raise workers and people’ awareness were undertaken outside the larger HP/EDS sites.
In France, demonstrations took place in front of the buildings in most of the HP/EDS sites. In all EDS offices outside of Paris, a day or half a day of strike was organised.
Signatures against management plans have been collected in several countries, amongst them Germany, Denmark, Switzerland and Hungary.
In Italy and United Kingdom lobbying initiatives have been undertaken towards members of Parliament.

In the light of this successful European-width mobilisation the trade unions and workers’ representatives will meet shortly to discuss and prepare future actions.
___________
The EMF is the representative body defending the interests of workers in the European metal industry. The EMF has a mandate for the external representation and coordination of the metalworkers' unions and a mandate to engage in bargaining at European level.
UNI-Europa is the European trade union organisation for skills and services.
For further information please contact:
Editor, Peter Scherrer, EMF General Secretary
Isabelle Barthès, EMF Policy Advisor on Company Policy +32(0)2 227 10 12
Gerd Rohde, UNI-Europa + 41 (0)1 792 02 19 28

Caroline Jacobsson
Information & Communications adviser
*******************************
European Metalworkers' Federation, EMF
Fédération Européenne des Métallurgistes, FEM
Europäischer Metallgewerkschaftsbund, EMB
International Trade Union House (ITUH)
Boulevard du Roi Albert II, 5 (bte 10)
B-1210 Brussels
cjacobsson@emf-fem.org
www.emf-fem.org
http://www.gmworkersblog.com/
http://www.precariouswork.eu/
Phone: +32.2.227.10.54
Fax: +32.2.217.59.63

European trade unions act against compulsory redundancies

Press Information ▪ Press Information

European trade unions act against compulsory redundancies
and the cutback of benefits at HP and EDS

Demands on European action day on 13th November

Trade union and European Works Council representatives from HP and EDS have already made it clear on several occasions that they will not accept a merger of two companies merge with the aim of downsizing (see EMF press releases of 8th September and 15th October 2008). They have called on the new management to explain how and where the new merged company would grow and how this would benefit its employees. They reject the plans to lay off 9,330 workers. These plans exceed the ‘worst scenario’ expectations held by many.

Against this background, the European trade unions have decided to call on all HP and EDS workers to mobilise on 13th November in a demonstration of European solidarity against the management’s plans.

On 13th November, EMF and UNI-Europa affiliates throughout Europe will undertake local/national actions as a sign of protest against plans for mass redundancies and cutbacks in benefits. They will call for alternative solutions aiming at safeguarding jobs and securing a sustainable future for their companies.

On this day of unity and solidarity, they will call on management to:

- provide full information and proper consultation with the trade union/employee representative bodies both at European and national levels;
- recognise the employees’ right to bargain collectively and to negotiate social plans;
- stop any compulsory redundancies;
- provide a detailed plan for redeployment and re-skilling for those whose jobs are at risk and prepare for anticipated skills shortages;
- create the conditions for the establishment of a new EWC to be built on the best elements and practices of the existing EWCs.
___________
The EMF is the representative body defending the interests of workers in the European metal industry. The EMF has a mandate for the external representation and coordination of the metalworkers' unions and a mandate to engage in bargaining at European level.
UNI-Europa is the European trade union organisation for skills and services.

For further information please contact:
Editor, Peter Scherrer, EMF General Secretary
Isabelle Barthès, EMF Policy Advisor on Company Policy +32(0)2 227 10 12
Gerd Rohde, UNI-Europa + 41 (0)1 792 02 19 28